#Aave与WLFI协议合作争议# Reflecting on the recent controversy between WLFI and Aave, it reminds me of the various disputes among early DeFi projects. The competition between Compound and MakerDAO back in the day also stirred quite a commotion, but ultimately both became industry benchmarks. In this incident, both parties have their own claims, and the truth still needs to be clarified. However, this kind of public controversy is not a good thing for the entire industry.

From historical experience, emerging projects often promise various attractive conditions to attract partners in the early stages, but as situations change, these promises can become burdensome. I remember a well-known project back in the day that fell into difficulties due to excessive early commitments and ultimately had to default. WLFI's current approach may also be leaving a way out for itself.

However, as a well-established DeFi project, Aave should be more cautious. Over the past few years, we have witnessed too many projects fall due to greed. The 7% token allocation is indeed tempting, but the associated risks must also be considered. If WLFI defaults, Aave will not only lose expected profits but may also affect its own reputation.

This incident reminds us once again that in the crypto world, everything must be based on smart contracts. Verbal promises, and even proposals that have been passed, can change for various reasons. As investors, we should pay more attention to the development of the project itself, rather than being blinded by short-term interests.

Looking back at the development of crypto, every controversy has pushed the industry forward. I hope that this incident between WLFI and Aave can encourage more projects to be more cautious in collaboration and make investors more rational. After all, only cooperation based on mutual trust can truly drive the progress of the entire industry.